o1 vs DeepSeek V3: Benchmark Comparison
Detailed comparison of o1 and DeepSeek V3 covering benchmarks, pricing, context window, and compliance.
Key Specifications
| Specification | o1 | DeepSeek V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | openai | deepseek |
| Version | o1 | v3 |
| Release Date | 2024-12-17 | 2024-12-26 |
| Context Window | 200000 tokens | 64000 tokens |
| Input Modalities | text | text |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
| License | Proprietary | DeepSeek License |
| SOC2 | ✓ | ✗ |
| HIPAA | ✓ | ✗ |
| GDPR | ✓ | ✗ |
| ISO 27001 | ✓ | ✗ |
Benchmark Results
| Benchmark | o1 | DeepSeek V3 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARC | 96.8 | — | o1 |
| BBH | 83.1 | 84.9 | DeepSeek V3 |
| GPQA | 57.5 | — | o1 |
| GSM8K | 88.9 | 89.3 | DeepSeek V3 |
| HUMANEVAL | 85.3 | 82.6 | o1 |
| IFEVAL | 82.2 | — | o1 |
| MATH | 55.7 | 61.6 | DeepSeek V3 |
| MMLU | 86.3 | 88.5 | DeepSeek V3 |
| MUSR | 71.8 | — | o1 |
| WINOGRANDE | 86.7 | — | o1 |
Pricing Comparison
| Tier (per Mtok) | o1 | DeepSeek V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Input | $15 | $0.27 |
| Output | $60 | $1.1 |
| Cache Read | $0 | $0.07 |
| Cache Write | $0 | $0.27 |
o1 gegen DeepSeek V3
Modellübersicht
o1 and DeepSeek V3 are both notable options in the AI model market. This page compares their benchmarks, pricing, and compliance.
Hauptspezifikationen
| Anbieter | Veröffentlichungsdatum | Kontextfenster | Lizenz |
|---|---|---|---|
| Openai / Deepseek | 2024-12-17 / 2024-12-26 | 200K / 64K | Proprietary / DeepSeek License |
Benchmark-Leistung
| Benchmark | o1 | DeepSeek V3 | Gewinner |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARC | 96.8 | — | A |
| BBH (BIG-Bench Hard) | 83.1 | 84.9 | B |
| GPQA | 57.5 | — | A |
| GSM8K (Grade School Math 8K) | 88.9 | 89.3 | Tie |
| HumanEval | 85.3 | 82.6 | A |
| IFEval | 82.2 | — | A |
| MATH | 55.7 | 61.6 | B |
| MMLU (Massive Multitask Language Understanding) | 86.3 | 88.5 | B |
| MUSR | 71.8 | — | A |
| WinoGrande | 86.7 | — | A |
Preisvergleich
| Eingabe | Ausgabe | Cache-Lesen | Cache-Schreiben |
|---|---|---|---|
| — / — | — / — | — / — | — / — |
pro Million Token — A / B
Stärken & Schwächen
o1
- ✅ MMLU score 86.3, strong knowledge reasoning.
- ✅ HumanEval 85.3, excellent code generation.
- ✅ GSM8K 88.9, robust math reasoning.
- ⚠️ 闭源专有模型，不支持自托管。
DeepSeek V3
- ✅ MMLU score 88.5, strong knowledge reasoning.
- ✅ HumanEval 82.6, excellent code generation.
- ✅ GSM8K 89.3, robust math reasoning.
- ✅ 采用 MoE 混合专家架构。
- ⚠️ 闭源专有模型，不支持自托管。
Redaktionsmeinung
o1 and DeepSeek V3 each have their strengths. Choose based on workload (code, long context, vision), referencing the tables above.
FAQ
Which model is better for coding tasks?
Refer to the HumanEval benchmark table; the model with a higher score is better suited for coding tasks.
Which model is cheaper?
Refer to the pricing comparison table above; the model with lower input/output prices is more cost-effective.
Which has a longer context window?
Refer to the key specifications table; the model with a larger context window is better for long documents.
Referenzen
Editor's Take
See Editor's Take section.