DeepSeek Coder 33B vs Code Llama 34B: Benchmark Comparison
Detailed comparison of DeepSeek Coder 33B and Code Llama 34B covering benchmarks, pricing, context window, and compliance.
Key Specifications
| Specification | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Code Llama 34B |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | deepseek | meta |
| Version | coder-33b | code-llama-34b |
| Release Date | 2024-01-25 | 2023-08-24 |
| Context Window | 16384 tokens | 16000 tokens |
| Input Modalities | text | text |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
| License | DeepSeek License | Llama 2 Community License |
| SOC2 | ✗ | ✗ |
| HIPAA | ✗ | ✗ |
| GDPR | ✗ | ✗ |
| ISO 27001 | ✗ | ✗ |
Benchmark Results
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Code Llama 34B | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARC | 92.2 | 88.7 | DeepSeek Coder 33B |
| BBH | 61.6 | 59.1 | DeepSeek Coder 33B |
| GPQA | 26.8 | 27 | Code Llama 34B |
| GSM8K | 69.7 | 59.8 | DeepSeek Coder 33B |
| HUMANEVAL | 71.8 | 71.7 | DeepSeek Coder 33B |
| IFEVAL | 58.8 | 58.7 | DeepSeek Coder 33B |
| MATH | 32.1 | 44.7 | Code Llama 34B |
| MMLU | 65.9 | 74.5 | Code Llama 34B |
| MUSR | 45.8 | 44.9 | DeepSeek Coder 33B |
| WINOGRANDE | 79.8 | 80 | Code Llama 34B |
Pricing Comparison
| Tier (per Mtok) | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Code Llama 34B |
|---|---|---|
| Input | $0.28 | $0.5 |
| Output | $0.28 | $0.5 |
| Cache Read | $0 | $0 |
| Cache Write | $0 | $0 |
DeepSeek Coder 33B contre Code Llama 34B
Aperçu du modèle
DeepSeek Coder 33B and Code Llama 34B are both notable options in the AI model market. This page compares their benchmarks, pricing, and compliance.
Spécifications clés
| Fournisseur | Date de sortie | Fenêtre de contexte | Licence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Deepseek / Meta | 2024-01-25 / 2023-08-24 | 16K / 16K | DeepSeek License / Llama 2 Community License |
Performance aux benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Code Llama 34B | Gagnant |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARC | 92.2 | 88.7 | A |
| BBH (BIG-Bench Hard) | 61.6 | 59.1 | A |
| GPQA | 26.8 | 27.0 | Tie |
| GSM8K (Grade School Math 8K) | 69.7 | 59.8 | A |
| HumanEval | 71.8 | 71.7 | Tie |
| IFEval | 58.8 | 58.7 | Tie |
| MATH | 32.1 | 44.7 | B |
| MMLU (Massive Multitask Language Understanding) | 65.9 | 74.5 | B |
| MUSR | 45.8 | 44.9 | A |
| WinoGrande | 79.8 | 80.0 | Tie |
Comparaison des prix
| Entrée | Sortie | Lecture cache | Écriture cache |
|---|---|---|---|
| — / — | — / — | — / — | — / — |
par million de jetons — A / B
Forces & Faiblesses
DeepSeek Coder 33B
- ✅ 可靠的通用模型。
- ⚠️ 闭源专有模型，不支持自托管。
- ⚠️ 上下文窗口 16K 偏小。
Code Llama 34B
- ✅ 可靠的通用模型。
- ⚠️ 闭源专有模型，不支持自托管。
- ⚠️ 上下文窗口 16K 偏小。
Avis de la rédaction
DeepSeek Coder 33B and Code Llama 34B each have their strengths. Choose based on workload (code, long context, vision), referencing the tables above.
FAQ
Which model is better for coding tasks?
Refer to the HumanEval benchmark table; the model with a higher score is better suited for coding tasks.
Which model is cheaper?
Refer to the pricing comparison table above; the model with lower input/output prices is more cost-effective.
Which has a longer context window?
Refer to the key specifications table; the model with a larger context window is better for long documents.
Références
Editor's Take
See Editor's Take section.