Key Specifications

SpecificationGrok-2Claude 3 Opus
Vendorxaianthropic
Version23-opus
Release Date2024-08-132024-03-04
Context Window131072 tokens200000 tokens
Input Modalitiestext, imagetext, image
Output Modalitiestexttext
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
SOC2
HIPAA
GDPR
ISO 27001

Benchmark Results

BenchmarkGrok-2Claude 3 OpusWinner
ARC94.5Claude 3 Opus
BBH8481.6Grok-2
GPQA46Claude 3 Opus
GSM8K93.291.8Grok-2
HUMANEVAL88.483.3Grok-2
IFEVAL79.2Claude 3 Opus
MATH76.842.7Grok-2
MMLU87.581.2Grok-2
MUSR53.3Claude 3 Opus
WINOGRANDE81.9Claude 3 Opus

Pricing Comparison

Tier (per Mtok)Grok-2Claude 3 Opus
Input$2$15
Output$10$75
Cache Read$0$0
Cache Write$0$0

Grok-2 contre Claude 3 Opus

Aperçu du modèle

Grok-2 and Claude 3 Opus are both notable options in the AI model market. This page compares their benchmarks, pricing, and compliance.

Spécifications clés

FournisseurDate de sortieFenêtre de contexteLicence
Xai / Anthropic2024-08-13 / 2024-03-04131K / 200KProprietary / Proprietary

Performance aux benchmarks

BenchmarkGrok-2Claude 3 OpusGagnant
ARC94.5B
BBH (BIG-Bench Hard)84.081.6A
GPQA46.0B
GSM8K (Grade School Math 8K)93.291.8A
HumanEval88.483.3A
IFEval79.2B
MATH76.842.7A
MMLU (Massive Multitask Language Understanding)87.581.2A
MUSR53.3B
WinoGrande81.9B

Comparaison des prix

EntréeSortieLecture cacheÉcriture cache
— / —— / —— / —— / —

par million de jetons — A / B

Forces & Faiblesses

Grok-2

  • ✅ MMLU score 87.5, strong knowledge reasoning.
  • ✅ HumanEval 88.4, excellent code generation.
  • ✅ GSM8K 93.2, robust math reasoning.
  • ✅ 支持文本、图像、音频多模态输入。
  • ⚠️ 闭源专有模型,不支持自托管。

Claude 3 Opus

  • ✅ MMLU score 81.2, strong knowledge reasoning.
  • ✅ HumanEval 83.3, excellent code generation.
  • ✅ GSM8K 91.8, robust math reasoning.
  • ✅ 支持文本、图像、音频多模态输入。
  • ✅ 上下文窗口 200K,支持长文本。
  • ⚠️ 闭源专有模型,不支持自托管。

Avis de la rédaction

Grok-2 and Claude 3 Opus each have their strengths. Choose based on workload (code, long context, vision), referencing the tables above.

FAQ

Which model is better for coding tasks?

Refer to the HumanEval benchmark table; the model with a higher score is better suited for coding tasks.

Which model is cheaper?

Refer to the pricing comparison table above; the model with lower input/output prices is more cost-effective.

Which has a longer context window?

Refer to the key specifications table; the model with a larger context window is better for long documents.

Références

Editor's Take

See Editor's Take section.