Key Specifications

SpecificationClaude 3.5 SonnetGrok-2
Vendoranthropicxai
Version3.5-sonnet2
Release Date2024-06-202024-08-13
Context Window200000 tokens131072 tokens
Input Modalitiestext, imagetext, image
Output Modalitiestexttext
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
SOC2
HIPAA
GDPR
ISO 27001

Benchmark Results

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 SonnetGrok-2Winner
BBH84.584Claude 3.5 Sonnet
GSM8K96.493.2Claude 3.5 Sonnet
HUMANEVAL9288.4Claude 3.5 Sonnet
MATH71.176.8Grok-2
MMLU88.787.5Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Pricing Comparison

Tier (per Mtok)Claude 3.5 SonnetGrok-2
Input$3$2
Output$15$10
Cache Read$0.3$0
Cache Write$3.75$0

Claude 3.5 Sonnet gegen Grok-2

Modellübersicht

Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Grok-2 are both notable options in the AI model market. This page compares their benchmarks, pricing, and compliance.

Hauptspezifikationen

AnbieterVeröffentlichungsdatumKontextfensterLizenz
Anthropic / Xai2024-06-20 / 2024-08-13200K / 131KProprietary / Proprietary

Benchmark-Leistung

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 SonnetGrok-2Gewinner
BBH (BIG-Bench Hard)84.584.0A
GSM8K (Grade School Math 8K)96.493.2A
HumanEval92.088.4A
MATH71.176.8B
MMLU (Massive Multitask Language Understanding)88.787.5A

Preisvergleich

EingabeAusgabeCache-LesenCache-Schreiben
— / —— / —— / —— / —

pro Million Token — A / B

Stärken & Schwächen

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

  • ✅ MMLU score 88.7, strong knowledge reasoning.
  • ✅ HumanEval 92.0, excellent code generation.
  • ✅ GSM8K 96.4, robust math reasoning.
  • ✅ 上下文窗口 200K,支持长文本。
  • ⚠️ 闭源专有模型,不支持自托管。

Grok-2

  • ✅ MMLU score 87.5, strong knowledge reasoning.
  • ✅ HumanEval 88.4, excellent code generation.
  • ✅ GSM8K 93.2, robust math reasoning.
  • ✅ 支持文本、图像、音频多模态输入。
  • ⚠️ 闭源专有模型,不支持自托管。

Redaktionsmeinung

Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Grok-2 each have their strengths. Choose based on workload (code, long context, vision), referencing the tables above.

FAQ

Which model is better for coding tasks?

Refer to the HumanEval benchmark table; the model with a higher score is better suited for coding tasks.

Which model is cheaper?

Refer to the pricing comparison table above; the model with lower input/output prices is more cost-effective.

Which has a longer context window?

Refer to the key specifications table; the model with a larger context window is better for long documents.

Referenzen

Editor's Take

See Editor's Take section.